Main Article Content

Abstract

According to the KPU, Gen Z first-time voters contributed 46,800,161 votes or 22.85% of the total number of voters in the 2024 Election. This figure has a significant influence on the success of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates in gaining votes. Voters who are voting for the first time in the 2024 Presidential Election are an experience that is greeted with enthusiasm and also confusion. Related to this enthusiasm, Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates must understand the psychology and motivations of these voters, which will later provide insight to Gen Z in actualizing their enthusiasm in their participation in the political arena. Gen Z voters tend to support candidates who prioritize attention to their interests such as values??on issues such as environmental protection, social justice, and an emphasis on sustainability and ethical considerations that extend to political preferences. Gen Z is known for their mastery of technology, so the process of searching for information is often done through the use of gadgets. However, to embrace Gen Z voters, there is a challenge because Gen Z is wisely involved in the election process by considering the candidate's platform and policies before voting. The purpose of this study is to describe the experiences of Gen Z in Jakarta in carrying out their roles as first-time voters in the 2024 Presidential Election. This study uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. The informants who were interviewed in depth consisted of 10 people who lived in Jakarta. The results of the study show that informants tend to have motivation to use their voting rights, although there are Gen Z who participate at the encouragement of their parents. Gen Z's expectations of leaders are that they can answer problems during previous leadership, have responsibility, track records, experience and vision and mission that can be trusted, and have the soul of a leader. Sources of information accessed are Twitter, television, and parents. The message that sticks is a more specific message that is in accordance with the interests of Gen Z who have a character that is closely related to technology

Keywords

Phenomenology Gen Z Social Media Political Messages 2024 Presidential Election

Article Details

How to Cite
Masduki, D., Widianingsih, Y. ., & Simanihuruk, H. (2024). Political Messages On Social Media And Gen Z’s Choice In The 2024 Presidential Election: (Phenomenological Study of Gen Z In Jakarta). Pasundan Social Science Development, 5(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.56457/pascidev.v5i1.166

References

  1. Bhore, M., & Tapas, P. (2023). An exploratory study of factors influencing career decisions of Generation Z women in Data Science. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 21. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v21i0.2168
  2. Collisson, B., Eck, B. E., & Harig T. (2023). Introducing gen Z Psychology majors: Why They Chose to Major in Psychology (and What They Expect to Learn). Journal Scholarship of Teaching and Leaning in Psychology, 9(3), 276–287.
  3. Daherman, Y., & Taufiq, I. (2024). Simulation Intellectual Sign #Aniespresiden2024 In Social Media Bigdata Analysis. JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik), 9(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v9i2.54121
  4. Fitri, A. N., Fitri, F., Fabriar, S. R., Rachmawati, F., & Hilmi, M. (2023). Gen Z voter behavior in the 2024 presidential election: A virtual ethnographic study on the Instagram accounts of presidential candidates. Islamic Communication Journal, 8(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2023.8.2.18945
  5. Gultom, J. M. P. (2022). Strategi Pengembangan Karunia Melayani Dan Memimpin Dalam Gereja Lokal Pada Generasi Z Di Era Digital. Vox Dei: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pastoral , 3(2), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.46408/vxd.v3i2.165
  6. Herlina, M. G., & Syahchari, D. H. (2022). Soft Skill Analysis: Rasch Model on Generation Z in Greater Jakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Bisnis (JPEB), 10(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPEB.010.2.1
  7. Kara, A., & Min, M. K. (2024). Gen Z consumers’ sustainable consumption behaviors: influencers and moderators. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(1), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2022-0263
  8. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the Search Process: Information seeking from User’s Perspective. . Journal of The American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361–371.
  9. Kwon, W., Sok, S., Park, C., Oh, M., & Hong, S. (2022). Gen?Z memory pool system implementation and performance measurement. ETRI Journal, 44(3), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2021-0091
  10. Liu, J., Wang, C., Zhang, T. (Christina), & Qiao, H. (2023). Delineating the Effects of Social Media Marketing Activities on Generation Z Travel Behaviors. Journal of Travel Research, 62(5), 1140–1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875221106394
  11. Masripah, S., & Yusuf, L. (2024). PERBANDINGAN KRITERIA DECISION TREE PADA PENGETAHUAN MASYARAKAT PADA PEMILIHAN UMUM PRESIDEN INDONESIA. INTI Nusa Mandiri, 18(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.33480/inti.v18i2.5065
  12. Monalisa. (2023, November 27). Prabowo-Gibran Punya Goyang Bemoy, Anies-Imin “AMIN”, Ganjar-Mahfud Disarankan Poles Gaya Kampanye. Tribunnews.Com.
  13. Ohme, J., Marquart, F., & Kristensen, L. M. (2020). School lessons, social media and political events in a get-out-the-vote campaign: successful drivers of political engagement among youth? Journal of Youth Studies, 23(7), 886–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1645311
  14. Palupi, G. A., & Tutiasri, R. P. (2023). Pemilih Pemula dan Personal Branding Bakal Calon Presiden 2024 di Media Sosial (Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif terhadap Ganjar Pranowo). JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(11), 8646–8653. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i11.3181
  15. Pueschel, A., Johnson, R. C., & Dhanani, L. Y. (2020). Putting Gen Z first: Educating with a generational mind-set. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 594–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2020.103
  16. R. Dian. (2023, July 2). DPT Pemilu 2024 Dalam Negeri dan Luar Neger, 204,8 Juta Pemilih. Www.Kpu.Id.
  17. Robichaud, Z., & Yu, H. (2022). Do young consumers care about ethical consumption? Modelling Gen Z’s purchase intention towards fair trade coffee. British Food Journal, 124(9), 2740–2760. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0536
  18. Sitorus, M. S., & Sitorus, S. H. (2023). Partisipasi Generasi Z dalam Menggunakan Hak Pilih pada Pemilihan Umum 2024 di SMK Taruna Pekanbaru. EDU SOCIETY: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN, ILMU SOSIAL DAN PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT, 3(2), 969–976. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v3i2.344
  19. Suwarna, B., & Setianingsih, D. (2024, February 13). Pemilih Pemula Gen Z Antusias tapi Bingung. Www.Kompas.Id.
  20. Waworuntu, E. C., Kainde, S. J. R., & Mandagi, D. W. (2022). Work-Life Balance, Job Satisfaction and Performance Among Millennial and Gen Z Employees: A Systematic Review. Society, 10(2), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v10i2.464.