Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 164 Download : 287

Main Article Content

Abstract

Improving reading proficiency in students requires effective pedagogical approaches that are tailored to the individual needs and learning styles. This article aims to explore various pedagogical techniques and strategies that can be employed to enhance reading skills. This research uses a literature review method to analyze different approaches that have proven effective in reading instruction. Techniques such as reading modeling, group discussions, and the integration of technology in reading instruction are evaluated based on evidence from previous studies. Additionally, methods such as strategy-based learning, direct instruction, and active reading comprehension techniques are analyzed to identify ways to improve text understanding and student engagement. Other methods explored include digital literacy-based learning, which utilizes technology platforms to enrich students' reading experiences. The findings suggest that using a combination of these techniques, tailored to the characteristics and needs of the students, can result in significant improvements in reading proficiency. The study also emphasizes the importance of ongoing assessment to adjust pedagogical approaches in alignment with the students' reading development

Keywords

Pedagogical Approaches Reading Proficiency Learning Strategies

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Haryadi, R. N., Retnaningsih, W., & Sujito, S. (2025). Pedagogical Approaches to Boosting Reading Proficiency through Techniques and Strategies. Pasundan Social Science Development, 6(1), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.56457/pascidev.v6i1.261

References

  1. Barber, A. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2020). How reading motivation and engagement enable reading achievement: Policy implications. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 27–34.
  2. Bülbül, M. cSahin. (2024). Enhancing reading and writing instruction in inclusive environments: A meaningful and collaborative approach. Educational Research & Implementation, 1(1), 1–20.
  3. Caine, K. (2023). A Structured, Balanced Reading Block. California State University San Marcos.
  4. Coiro, J. (2021). Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 9–31.
  5. Dhakal, B. R. (2021). Differentiated reading instruction: Teacher beliefs and strategies. Journal of NELTA, 26(1–2), 56–69.
  6. Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2009). Leveled literacy intervention. Portsmouth, NH.
  7. Frankel, K. K. (2022). Remedial reading programs: Identification, instruction, and impacts of a separate system for learning. In How education policy shapes literacy instruction: Understanding the persistent problems of policy and practice (pp. 61–87). Springer.
  8. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & others. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. New York.
  9. Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  10. Mondesir, B., & Griffin, R. A. (2020). A balanced approach to literacy instruction and support for diverse learners. Georgia Journal of Literacy, 43(1), 30–48.
  11. Muñoz-Restrepo, A., Ramirez, M., & Gaviria, S. (2020). Strategies to enhance or maintain motivation in learning a foreign language. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 22(1), 175–188.
  12. Paige, D., Rupley, W. H., & Ziglari, L. (2024). Critical thinking in reading comprehension: Fine tuning the simple view of reading. Education Sciences, 14(3), 225.
  13. Rasinski, T. V, Blachowicz, C. L. Z., & Lems, K. (2012). Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices. Guilford Press.
  14. Schmidt, C., Brandenburg, J., Busch, J., Büttner, G., Grube, D., Mähler, C., & Hasselhorn, M. (2021). Developmental trajectories of phonological information processing in upper elementary students with reading or spelling disabilities. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 143–171.
  15. Scott, T., & Husain, F. N. (2021). Textbook Reliance: Traditional Curriculum Dependence Is Symptomatic of a Larger Educational Problem. Journal of Educational Issues, 7(1), 233–248.