Main Article Content

Abstract

The rapid evolution of the digital landscape has forced organizations to redefine their leadership paradigms to maintain workforce productivity, particularly among the tech-savvy Generation Z. This study aims to explore the role of Digital Leadership Transformation in enhancing the performance of Generation Z employees. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with leaders and Generation Z subordinates in various digital-based industries, complemented by thematic analysis. The findings indicate that digital leadership is not merely about technological proficiency but involves a fundamental shift in mindset toward transparency, agility, and collaborative empowerment. Generation Z employees perceive digital leadership transformation as a critical driver for their performance, as it fosters a work environment that values flexibility and rapid feedback. The study identifies three key pillars of effective digital leadership: digital vision, digital social capital, and digital adaptability. These elements collectively minimize the "generational gap" and align organizational goals with the intrinsic motivations of Gen Z. In conclusion, a successful transformation into a digital leader significantly boosts Generation Z’s engagement and output by providing the autonomy and digital infrastructure they require. This research suggests that organizations must prioritize leadership development programs that focus on digital empathy and decentralized decision-making to optimize the potential of their youngest workforce.

Keywords

Digital Leadership Generation Z Employee Performance

Article Details

How to Cite
Gunawan, A., Mulyadi, D. ., & Suhendar, F. R. . (2026). Digital Leadership Transformation In Enhancing Generation Z Employee Performance. Pasundan Social Science Development, 6(1), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.56457/pascidev.v6i1.322

References

  1. Al-Mansoori, R. S., & Koç, M. (2019). Toward knowledge-based economy: Innovation and transformational leadership in public universities in Texas and Qatar. Sustainability, 11(23), 6721.
  2. Bonnet, D., & Westerman, G. (2020). The new elements of digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 62(2).
  3. Büyükbe?e, T., Dikba?, T., Klein, M., & Ünlü, S. B. (2022). A study on digital leadership scale (DLS) development. Kahramanmara{c{s}} Sütçü {.I}mam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 740–760.
  4. Cortellazzo, L., Andrea, M., & others. (2025). Developing collective leadership: the role of complexity. In Creativity that Goes a Long Way. EGOS European Group for Organizational Studies.
  5. Dimock, J. P., Key, A., & Jaques, A. R. (2021). Assessing Argumentation Literacy. In Local Theories of Argument (pp. 458–465). Routledge.
  6. Gandasari, D., & Dwidienawati, D. (2020). Evaluation of online learning with digital communication media during the COVID 19 pandemic. Journal of the Social Sciences, 48(3).
  7. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Nguyen-Phillips, A., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2017). Achieving digital maturity. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(1).
  8. Lindert, L., Zeike, S., Choi, K.-E., & Pfaff, H. (2022). Transformational leadership and employees? psychological wellbeing: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 676.
  9. Priadana, M. S., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Pascal Books.
  10. Pugu, M. R., Riyanto, S., & Haryadi, R. N. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian; Konsep, Strategi, dan Aplikasi. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
  11. Saputra, N., Nugroho, R., Aisyah, H., & Karneli, O. (2021). Digital skill during covid-19: effects of digital leadership and digital collaboration. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 19(2), 272--â.
  12. Tigre, F. B., Curado, C., & Henriques, P. L. (2023). Digital leadership: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(1), 40–70.