Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of the concepts of ju'?lah and maisir within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh mu'?malah), focusing on their ontological, normative, and applicative dimensions in contemporary economic practices. These two concepts are often partially understood, whereas in modern economic realities—particularly within digital systems, reward-based economies, and probability-driven incentive mechanisms—they tend to overlap in interpretation. Ju'?lah, as a permissible contract in Islamic law, is characterized by the provision of rewards for achieving uncertain outcomes, yet it remains grounded in productive effort and the pursuit of public benefit (ma?la?ah). In contrast, maisir is strictly prohibited due to its inherent elements of excessive uncertainty (gharar f??ish), speculation, and exploitative gain at the expense of others. This research employs a qualitative approach using a library research method, analyzing primary sources from classical fiqh literature alongside contemporary works in Islamic economics. The analytical framework is based on descriptive-analytical and comparative methods, examining both concepts through the lenses of objectives (maq??id al-shar?'ah), transactional mechanisms, and socio-economic implications. The findings reveal that although both ju'?lah and maisir involve elements of uncertainty, they differ fundamentally in their contractual structure, value orientation, and impact on economic justice. Ju'?lah aligns with the principles of maq??id al-shar?'ah, particularly in the protection of wealth (?if? al-m?l) and the promotion of productive economic activities, whereas maisir contradicts these principles by fostering speculative behavior and unjust wealth distribution. In the context of the digital economy, this study underscores the necessity of a fiqh approach that is not merely textual but also substantive and contextual, in order to clearly distinguish between Shariah-compliant practices and prohibited activities. Therefore, this research contributes theoretically to the development of contemporary Islamic jurisprudence while also providing a normative foundation for formulating adaptive Shariah economic policies in response to evolving global trends.

Keywords

Ju'?lah Maisir Fiqh Muamalah Maq??id al-Syar?'ah

Article Details

How to Cite
Sani, B., Januri, M. F. ., & Rusyana, A. Y. . (2026). Comparative Analysis Of The Concepts Of Ju’?lah And Maisir From The Perspective Of Fiqh Muamalah. Pasundan Social Science Development, 6(2), 630–647. https://doi.org/10.56457/pascidev.v6i2.382

References

  1. Ahmad, N., Hanapi, M. S., & Yasin, Y. F. (2025). Maqasid Shariah and Islamic Fintech Research: Trends, Topics and Collaborations. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun.
  2. Ahmed, H. (2011). Product development in Islamic banks. Edinburgh University Press.
  3. Al-Ghazali. (n.d.). Ihya' 'ulum al-din. Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.
  4. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1994). The lawful and the prohibited in Islam. American Trust Publications.
  5. Al-Shatibi. (n.d.). Al-Muwafaqat fi usul al-sharia. Dar Ibn Affan.
  6. Al-Zuhayli, W. (1989). Al-fiqh al-Islami wa adillatuhu (Vols. 1–8). Dar al-Fikr.
  7. Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
  8. Bridging Islamic Philanthropy and Digital Economy: A Maqasid Shariah Model for Zakat on Digital Assets. Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah (2025).
  9. Chapra, M. U. (2000). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective. Islamic Foundation.
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  11. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
  12. Harefa, S. (2025). The fundamental principles of Islamic law in the digital era: An ushul fiqh and maqashid Sharia approach. Journal of Islamic Law on Digital Economy and Business.
  13. Ibn Qud?mah. (1997). Al-Mughni. Dar Alam al-Kutub.
  14. Integrating Maqasid Shariah in Enhancing MSME Business Sustainability in the Digital Economy. el-Jizya: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam (2025).
  15. Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari'ah law: An introduction. Oneworld Publications.
  16. Lubaba, A., Herdiana, F., & Anggriyani, D. (2024). Integrasi ekonomi digital dan prinsip syariah: Kajian literatur. Misykah: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Studi Islam.
  17. Maqasid Shariah-Based Digital Economy Model: Integration, Sustainability and Transformation. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law (2024).
  18. Marwah, A., bin Sapa, N., & Syatar, A. (2025). Integrating Maqashid al-Shariah into Islamic Economic Practices: A Contemporary Analytical Framework and Its Applications. El-Kahfi: Journal of Islamic Economics.
  19. Melzatia, S., Mahroji, K. Y. S., & Daryanto, E. (2025). Digitalisation of Islamic Economy and Maqasid Sharia for Social Resilience and Welfare. Jurnal Lemhannas RI.
  20. Muzarkosah, I., & Sumpena, M. (2026). Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Berbasis Maqashid dan Maslahah di Era Digital. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.
  21. Usmani, M. T. (2002). An introduction to Islamic finance. Kluwer Law International.
  22. Wahab, A., & Mahdiya, I. (2026). Reconceptualizing halal industry governance in the digital economy: A maqasid al-Sharia based legal framework. Journal of Islamic Law on Digital Economy and Business.
  23. Zaenudin. (2025). Tinjauan Maqasid Al-Syariah terhadap Pola Integrasi Zakat, Wakaf, dan Social Finance di Era Digital. AL-AQWAL.