Main Article Content

Abstract

The implementation of the Quality Assurance System for Private Universities in the City of Bandung is currently still not effective, in the sense that the implementation of the quality assurance system is not fully in accordance with the quality instruments set by the government. The focus of this research is Policy Evaluation in the implementation of the Quality Assurance System for Private Higher Education in the City of Bandung. The sub-focus of this research is the dimensions that need to be carried out in evaluating quality assurance system implementation policies, namely: administrative evaluation, judicial evaluation and political evaluation. This research uses a qualitative descriptive analysis method and is supported by the SWOT technique. This was chosen with the consideration that actual data can be obtained, being able to study the research problem in depth so that results can be obtained that are in line with expectations. The results of the research show that the implementation of the Quality Assurance System for Private Higher Education in the City of Bandung is still not effective, so policy evaluation is needed through (1) Administrative evaluation taking into account: Effort Evaluation, Performance Evaluation, Adequacy of Performance, Efficiency Evaluation and Process Evaluation, (2) Judicial evaluation by paying attention to: Issues of legal validity, Possible Violations of the Constitution, Possible Violations of the Legal System, Possible Violations of Ethics and State Administration Rules, (3) Political evaluation by paying attention to: Political Process in determining policies, Acceptance of political constituents towards public policies, Implementation Information Technology. The results of the policy evaluation in this research then produced a recommendation strategy regarding the implementation of a higher education quality assurance system that is in accordance with government standards.

Keywords

Policy Evaluation Quality Assurance System Implementation Strategy

Article Details

How to Cite
Supriatna, A., Harits, B., & Azis, Y. M. A. (2023). Strategy for Evaluation of Quality Assurance System Implementation Policies in Increasing the Competitiveness of Private Universities in the City of Bandung. Pasundan Social Science Development, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.56457/pascidev.v4i1.78

References

  1. Dwiyanto, Agus, (2012). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, Peduli, Inklusif, dan Kolaboratif, Jokyakarta, Gajahmada University Press.
  2. Imawan, Riswandha. (2002). “Peningkatan Daya Saing: Pendekatan Paradigmatik dan Politis”. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Vol. 6, No.1, Juli 2002. Hal. 79-104
  3. Keban, Yaremias., (2008). Enam Strategis Administrasi Publik, Konsep, Strategi dan Isu, Jokyakarta: Gava Media
  4. Lester, James P, and Yoseph Stewart (2000). Public Policy: An Evolutionary Approach. Australia: Wodsworth, Second edition
  5. Ma’arif, S., dan Tanjung, H., (2003), Manajemen Operasi, Jakarta: Grasindo
  6. Nugroho, Riant Dwidjowijoto. (2007). Analisis Kebijakan, Jakarta: PT Elekmedia Komputindo, Jakarta
  7. Parsons, Wayne, (2011). Public Policy: Pengantar Teori dan Praktik Analisis Kebijakan, Jakarta: Kencana
  8. Potter, Micel E. (2001). Competitive Advantage. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. (Jakarta: PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
  9. Safi’i, Muhammad, dan Vidy. (2017), “Perancangan sistem informasi badan penjaminan mutu internal STMIK Balikpapan berbasis website responsive”. METIK Jurnal Volume 1 No. 2 Tahun 2017, hal. 1-7.
  10. Salam, R., Sudiarti, S., Baharuddin, A., & Sunarsi, D. (2022). KOMPETENSI KEPALA DAERAH DALAM PELAYANAN PUBLIK PEMERINTAH PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN. Jurnal Pallangga Praja (JPP), 4(1), 65-77.
  11. Sallis, Edward. (2006). Total Quality Management in Education. Terjemahan Ahmad Ali Riyadi. Yogyakarta: IRCISoD
  12. Simon, Herbert A. (2005). Public Administration, Third Printing, New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers
  13. Suaedi, Falih dan Bintoro Wardiyanto. (2010). Revitalisasi Administrasi Negara, Reformasi Birokrasi dan e-Governance. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  14. Subarsono, AG, (2005), Analisis Kebijakan Publik: Konsep, Teori dan Aplikasi, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
  15. Suharto, Edi. (2010), Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Bandung, Alfabeta
  16. Susilo, Willy. (2003). Audit Mutu Internal: Panduan Praktis Para Praktisi Manajemen Mutu dan Auditor Mutu Internal. Jakarta: Vorqistatama Binamega
  17. Thoha, Miftah. (2011). Ilmu Adminsitrasi Publik Kontemporer, Jakarta, Kencana Premada Media Group,
  18. Ulber Silalahi. (2009). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Refika Aditama.